<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>Kenzoid&#039;s Autonomous Zone &#187; apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenzoid.com/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenzoid.com</link>
	<description>Welcome to my world...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Kindle v. iPad &#8211; my thoughts</title>
		<link>http://kenzoid.com/2010/01/28/kindle-v-ipad-my-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://kenzoid.com/2010/01/28/kindle-v-ipad-my-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Kennedy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenzoid.com/?p=1908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Along with many others, I sat and watched the announcement of the iPad earlier this week. If nothing else, Apple certainly knows how to hype and put on a show! It&#8217;s a pretty device, certainly, but I have no plans on purchasing one. And as for being a Kindle-killer? I think not, and certainly hope [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along with many others, I sat and watched the announcement of the iPad earlier this week. If nothing else, Apple certainly knows how to hype and put on a show! It&#8217;s a pretty device, certainly, but I have no plans on purchasing one. And as for being a Kindle-killer? I think not, and certainly hope not, being a pretty happy Kindle user. I think a comparison of the two contrasts both the differing ideas on device functionality that Amazon and Apple espouse, and also the &#8220;openness&#8221; question that has troubled the Kindle. If the Kindle is closed, what about the iPad?</p>
<p>The most obvious difference between the devices is the simplest: the screen. The Kindle screen is a low-power reflective e-ink screen that only displays black, white, and shades of gray; the iPad is a full-color, touch-sensitive backlit (emissive) screen that is designed for all sorts of media consumption, including music, movies, full-color magazines, and web browsing.</p>
<p>The Kindle is designed and optimized for reading books and text-focused periodicals. While it does have a (free) 3G wireless connection, said connection is focused on easily delivering content to the device, and light browsing of sites like Wikipedia. The Kindle is a reading device; it tries to get out of the way of the reader, and just provide the words (honestly, once I get into the flow of a work, I often forget I&#8217;m reading on a &#8220;device&#8221;). Even with the recent release of a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/kdk/">SDK that will allow app development</a>, I maintain that the Kindle is a limited function device, and I like that. Reading is best done on a device with limited distractions, and the Kindle is just that.</p>
<p>The iPad is designed and marketed for a completely different experience. It&#8217;s really more of a &#8220;netbook without a keyboard&#8221;; I can definitely see it being more of a threat to some of the devices in that market segment. Multimedia from the get-go. For me, it&#8217;s not as attractive; I read and listen to more than I watch. I use my phone (Android G1) for podcasts, audio streams, and music, and the Kindle for text (with the G1 as a fairly capable backup). I&#8217;m not a big movie and TV consumer.</p>
<p>Another difference, for me,  is the Kindle&#8217;s ability to stand <q>alone</q>. A Kindle never actually needs ANY connection to a PC whatsoever; you can use the USB connector to charge the device from a computer, and when connected in that way, it can be mounted as a USB Mass Storage device. This means you can drag and drop files both ways&#8230;you can copy off your books as a backup strategy, and you can put books on the device that you didn&#8217;t get from Amazon. It&#8217;s great; but none of that is necessary. You do, of course, have to have an Amazon account to purchase things via WhisperNet, but that&#8217;s the limit. You can purchase on the device and have it immediately delivered, or open up a Linux-based netbook, buy the book via browser at Amazon, copy it down to the filesystem, and mount the Kindle as a USB device and copy it over. Works just the same.</p>
<p>The iPad, on the other hand, is tied completely to the same Apple iTunes software stack that the iPod and iPhone are. All purchases and media are sync&#8217;d via iTunes&#8230;which doesn&#8217;t run on Linux, for example. You can&#8217;t backup your media (in a supported way) without involving iTunes. You can&#8217;t purchase media without involving iTunes. You and iTunes are joined at the hip&#8230;at minimum.</p>
<p>The strategies of the companies involved (Apple and Amazon) are interesting as well, and the jockeying between them continues even as I&#8217;ve been editing this post. More to come on that and the openness question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenzoid.com/2010/01/28/kindle-v-ipad-my-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
